顶,这句话来得真是时候。RT: @1416classroom: 信末是爱因斯坦的一句话：Imagination is better than knowledge。很多时候，做什么不是重要的，关键是怎么做，为什么做的问题。
|
|
|
|
|
|
可能是上QQ上得多了，感觉很无聊，其实从一些玩得博客多的人来看，玩QQ空间是很低级的。于是，就随gaby的知道，尝试使用现在流行的blogger和wordpress主流博客。当时我之前花得最多心思算是MSN的博客了（http://jesusming.spaces.live.com/）。
那怎么把原来的博客搬家呢。下面就是我的经历：
一、导出MSN日志，转换到wordpress
在wordpress注册了一个博客，然后接下来就是通过一个方法导出原来MSN的博客文章，具体参见下面的网址：http://b2.broom9.com/?page_id=519
要说明的是这几个点：
1、如教程所说，在MSN日志的设置里面把日期设置好： 打开共享空间主页：共享空间 ?* 选项 ?* 日志 选择“在页首处显示日志发布日期”
2、同样是教程所说，把日期的年份显示出来
3、要注意所下载的版本必须按照教程提示的版本组合，否则不成功，后来还是有gaby帮忙抓取成功的。
然后把export_mmddyyyy-hhmm.xml 文件导入到wordpress网站即发布成功了。至于其他的非MSN博客，看这里
我的wordpress地址： http://jesusming.wordpress.com/
二、把wordpress的博客再转换到blogger
在blogger（http://www.blogger.com/）注册一个博客
这个简单许多：
1、从wordpress的控制面板导出：wordpress.yyyy-mm-dd.xml
2、打开这个网站：http://wordpress2blogger.appspot.com/ 把上面得到的xml文件转换成另外一个文件：blogger-export.xml
3、把上面最终的blogger-export.xml文件导入到blogger网站。至于怎么导？看这里
我的blogger地址 http://jesusming.blogspot.com/
至此，基本写完了，这么瞎忙活后看了知道了，其实MSN的中文博客做得还是比较成熟和容易让人接受的。而blogger就是google的一整套东西中的一个，真的可能要用享用一下“全套服务”，那才叫一个爽。为什么？用了Google的产品你就知道（比较不好的比方就是，就像你从QQ开始到游戏，到邮件、到空间……诸如此类）。
延伸阅读：
Google Blogger使用技巧
将电子邮件发布博客进行到底（MSN Spaces）
通过邮件发文章到wordpress，这个是我想做的，还没做。
自动邮件发送博客文章的WordPress插件
其实，这一切，皆因这个插件，就是因为MSN的共享空间和Qzone都不可以用，所以才有了这番折磨。它：Clip Mark 插件： http://clipmarks.com/faq/
当然 wordpress的是贴上来的，还不可以通过邮件来发送。
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!
看看这个空间，从去年的今天到今年的今天，中间仅仅隔了十篇日志，大部分是抄袭，剩下的似乎是牢骚。
身边不少奔三的，大学同学结婚的也不少，说明什么呢，年纪不小了。日志自己写的不多，说明什么呢，实践的太少了，基本是按着固定的路线做着重复的事情。
有什么收获嘛，不能说没有，硬件似乎基本上没问题了。软件上呢，买了电脑后看书就少了，脑子空空，所以也只有发发牢骚的份了。接下来，估计行动是最重要的了。加油吧！
|
From www.Poyn.org
Behind CNN’s New Citizen Media Site
A YouTube for news
|
|
| By Jonathan Dube (more by author) CyberJournalist.net Publisher ONA President |
E-mail this item Print this Page Add Your Comments on this Article |
 Note: After seven wonderful years of Web Tips columns, we’re going to broaden our focus from Web-based reporting tools to the variety of ways journalists are using the Web. We hope you’ll stick with us for Web Tips 2.0.
Most news organizations are looking for ways to tap their audiences for photos, videos and eyewitness reports. But many still struggle with how to embrace user-generated content while still ensuring accuracy and quality.
After a year-and-a-half of experience soliciting material from its audiences, CNN is embarking on a new approach worth observing. Earlier this month, CNN launched a new site dedicated to user-generated content that is unmoderated — basically, a news version of YouTube. The site, currently in "beta" or test mode, can be viewed at iReport.com. Since August 2006, CNN has been featuring audience submitted photos and video on CNN and CNN.com under the "iReport" brand — but only material carefully vetted by its journalists. The network has received nearly 100,000 news-related photos and videos from viewers, but only published or aired about 10 per cent.
Now, all of those submissions, and everything submitted going forward, can be viewed at iReport.com. In fact, the site explicitly states, "CNN makes no guarantees about the content or the coverage on iReport.com" — quite a bold statement from a reputable news organization, not to mention one that brands itself as the 揗ost Trusted Name in News.?br> What if we turned this site over to you? What if we allowed people to post raw video and tell stories you抎 never see on CNN? What if it had politically-incorrect speech? What if it didn’t matter if the stories were balanced? What if, instead of us confirming every nuance, we trusted you to determine what was and what wasn’t accurate?
What if we created a site where the community — not CNN — became the 揗ost Trusted Name in News??/span> And so, we developed iReport.com. Don抰 kid yourselves. This content is not pre-vetted or pre-read by CNN. This is your platform. In some journalisitic circles, this is considered disruptive, even controversial! But we know the news universe is changing. We know that even here, at CNN, we can’t be everywhere, all the time following all the stories you care about. So, we give you iReport.com. You will program it, you will police it; you will decide what抯 important, what’s interesting, what抯 news. CNN will be doing limited post-moderation: Users can "flag" items they feel violate the community guidelines and iReport.com moderators will review them and decide whether to put those items behind a warning wall or take them down altogether.
CNN also is providing some basic journalism tips as part of the iReport site. Susan Grant, executive vice president of CNN News Services, answered some questions about the new site via e-mail: ‘If I could bend the ear of other news organizations venturing into this arena, I would tell them what we tell ourselves every day at CNN: Strive to be open and transparent — with your audience and your employees.’
?Susan Grant Why did CNN.com decide to launch iReport.com as a separate site from CNN.com?
It is important to draw a clear distinction between the trusted news and information brand of CNN.com and an unvetted, user-generated community site like iReport.com. It’s much easier for the consumer to distinguish the difference in the content if the sites themselves are separate. Do you expect the launch of iReport.com to change the way you use user-generated content on CNN and CNN.com? Not at all. CNN will continue to use iReports on-air and on CNN.com if and only if they have been vetted. The launch of iReport.com is the natural progression for CNN’s iReport initiative. It makes all user-generated material submitted to CNN available for the public to see. Previously, only a select number of iReports were available for viewing after being vetted by CNN’s editorial staff. This user-generated content site, at its core, will be driven by the users; therefore, all of the content the iReport.com community creates will be available online at iReport.com. Users may still visit www.cnn.com/iReport to view vetted submissions that have appeared on CNN air and CNN.com; and iReport.com also will label those contributions with an "on CNN" tag to indicate that the submission appeared on a CNN network or CNN.com. How does moderation work for CNN and CNN.com? What is the process and how many people are involved?
Before an iReport is used on-air or on CNN.com, the content undergoes the same extensive vetting process as all of CNN’s reporting does. Our own journalists, who are well trained at verifying the authenticity of news reports and events, follow steps to verify the events captured in iReports that are used on CNN and on CNN.com. There is no set number of people involved in the process, as each CNN reporter, producer and show has the ability to select an iReport submission appropriate to use in their reporting.
How will iReport differ from what some of your compeitiors are doing, i.e. Fox News Channel’s uReport, MSNBC’s FirstPerson, ABC News’ i-Caught? iReport.com wasn’t developed to compete with broadcast and cable news outlets; rather it is the natural progression of our iReport initiative that has been in operation since August 2006. Individual iReport.com contributors may gain additional recognition for their content by having that material, once vetted and approved for use, appear on a CNN television network or CNN.com, just as iReporters do today. iReport.com is focused on what people consider news, and we expect the site to be a destination for Internet users to inform and engage, rather than simply be entertained. Further, the concept of "community" on many news sites is more about reactions to news reported by the mainstream media. iReport.com not only invites users to submit their own news stories, but also fosters dialogue — empowering the community to drive the news, not just follow it. Since first launching iReports on CNN and CNN.com, what lessons have you learned? With the constantly evolving media landscape, consumers increasingly expect to take a more active role in the discussion of events — local and global. While CNN has many networks and platforms dedicated to traditional reporting, we also wanted to offer our audiences the opportunity to participate in their own way — in the submission and discussion of events. CNN decided to expand its user-generated content initiatives not only because of the incredible success of our existing iReport program, but also the high level of user-participation on CNN.com via our "Sound Off" feature, blog commenting and the incredibly active online discussions during presidential debates. CNN is in a unique position to provide the public with the tools and resources to share, view, discuss and form communities about news that is important to them. What advice do you have for other organizations, such as newspapers and smaller broadcasters, who want to start soliciting and publishing user-generated content? I’m not sure how much advice we have for others — we’re still learning so much ourselves! But if I could bend the ear of other news organizations venturing into this arena, I would tell them what we tell ourselves every day at CNN: Strive to be open and transparent — with your audience and your employees |
